SOLAR ENERGY TECHNOLOGY BREAKTHROUGH!

Wind Power

Showing posts with label environmental protection. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environmental protection. Show all posts

Thursday, July 3, 2008

Environmental protection using Biotechnology – An overview:




Environmental protection using Biotechnology – An overview:

A. The surroundings around us are termed as ‘environment’. Our environment includes the abiotic component (the non living) and biotic component (the living). The abiotic environment includes air, water and soil; and the biotic environment consists of all living organisms such as plants, animals and microorganisms. Environmental pollution broadly refers to the presence of undesirable substances in the environment which are harmful to man and other organisms. There has been a significant increase in the levels of harmful environmental pollution mostly due to direct or indirect human activities in recent past. The major sources of environmental pollution are industries, agricultural and other anthropogenic and biogenic sources etc. The pollutants are chemical, biological and physical in nature.

B. Controlling the environmental pollution and the conservation of environment and biodiversity and controlling environmental pollution are the major focus areas of all the countries around the world. In this context, the importance and impact of biotechnological approaches and the implications of biotechnology has to be thoroughly evaluated. There have been serious concerns regarding the use of biotechnological products and the impact assessment of these products due to their interaction with the environmental factors. A lobby of the environmentalists has expressed alarm on the release of genetically engineered organisms in the atmosphere and have stressed on thorough investigation and proper risk assessment of theses organisms before releasing them in to the environment. The effect of the effluents from biotechnological companies is also a cause of concern for everyone. The need of the hour is to have a proper debate on the safety of the use of the biotechnological products. The efforts are not only on to use biotechnology to protect the environment from pollution but also to use it to conserve the natural resources. As we all know that microorganisms are known natural scavengers so the microbial preparations (both natural as well as genetically engineered) can be used to clean up the environmental hazards.

C. Biotechnology is being used to provide alternative cleaner technologies which help to further reduce the hazardous environmental implications of the traditional technologies. Some of the well known examples and mechanisms are:

(i) Some fermentation technologies have some serious environmental implications. Various biotechnological processes have been devised in which all nutrients introduced for fermentation are retained in the final product, which ensures high conversion efficiency and low environmental impact.

(ii) In paper industry, the pulp bleaching technologies are being replaced by more environmentally friendly technologies involving biotechnology. The pulp processing helps to remove the lignin without damaging valuable cellulosic fibres but the available techniques suffer from the disadvantages of high costs, high energy use and corrosion. A lignin degrading and modifying enzyme (LDM) was isolated from Phanerochaete chrysosporum and was used, which on one hand, helped to reduce the energy costs and corrosion and on the other hand increased the life of the system. This approach helped in reducing the environmental hazards associated with bleach plant effluents.

(iii) In Plastic industry, the conventional technologies use oil based raw materials to extract ethylene and propylene which are converted to alkene oxides and then polymerized to form plastics such as polypropylene and polyethylene. There is always the risk of these raw materials escaping into the atmosphere thereby causing pollution. Using biotechnology, more safer raw materials like sugars (glucose) are being used which are enzymatically or through the direct use of microbes converted into alkene oxides.e.g. Methylococcus capsulatus has been used for converting alkene into alkene oxides.

(iv) Bioremediation is defined as ‘the process of using microorganisms to remove the environmental pollutants where microbes serve as scavengers. The removal of organic wastes by microbes leads to environmental cleanup. The other names/terms used for bioremediation are bio-treatment, bio-reclamation, and bio-restoration. The term “Xenobiotics” (xenos means foreign) refers to the unnatural, foreign and synthetic chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, refrigerants, solvents and other organic compounds. The microbial degradation of xenobiotics also helps in reducing the environmental pollution. Depending on the method followed to clean up the environment, the bioremediation is carried out in two ways:

(a) In situ bioremediation – involves a direct approach for the microbial degradation of xenobiotics at the site of pollution which could be soil, water etc. The in situ bioremediation is generally used for clean up of oil spillages, beaches etc.;

(b) Ex-situ bioremediation - In this the waste and the toxic material is collected from the polluted sites and the selected range of microorganisms carry out the bioremediation at designed place. This process is an improved method over the in situ bioremediation method.

(v) Pseudomonas which is a soil microorganism effectively degrades xenobiotics. Different strains of Pseudomonas that are capable of detoxifying more than 100 organic compounds (e.g. phenols, biphenyls, organophosphates, naphthalene etc.) have been identified. Some other microbial strains are also known to have the capacity to degrade xenobiotics such as Mycobacterium, Alcaligenes, Norcardia etc.

D. In recent years, efforts have been made to create genetically engineered microorganisms to enhance bioremediation. This is done to overcome some of the limitations and problems in bioremediation. These problems are: a) Sometimes the growth of microorganisms gets inhibited or reduced by the xenobiotics. b) No single naturally occurring microorganisms has the capability of degrading all the xenobiotics present in the environmental pollution. c) The microbial degradation is a very slow process. d) Sometimes certain xenobiotics get adsorbed on to the particulate matter of soil and thus become unavailable for microbial degradation.

E. As the majority of genes responsible for the synthesis of enzymes with biodegradation capability that are located on the plasmids, the genetic manipulations of plasmids can lead to the creation of new strains of bacteria with different degradative pathways. Well known example of genetic manipulations of plasmids is development of ‘Superbug’, which is used for degrading a number of hydrocarbons of petroleum simultaneously such as camphor, octane, xylene, naphthalene etc.

F. We all know that, carbon dioxide (CO2) is the main cause of green house effect and rise in the atmospheric temperature. There is a steady increase in the CO2 content due to continuous addition of CO2 from various sources particularly from industrial processes. It is very clear that the reduction in atmospheric CO2 concentration assumes significance. Biotechnological methods have been used to reduce the atmospheric CO2 content at two levels:

(a) Photosynthesis- Plants utilize CO2 during the photosynthesis which reduces the CO2 content in the atmosphere;

(b) Biological Calcification- Certain deep sea organisms like corals, green and red algae store CO2 through a process of biological calcification. As the CaCO3 gets precipitated, more and more atmospheric CO2 can be utilized for its formation.

G. The sewage is treated to get rid of these undesirable substances by subjecting the organic matter to biodegradation by microorganisms. The biodegradation involves the degradation of organic matter to smaller molecules, such as CO2, NH3, PO4 etc., and requires constant supply of oxygen. The process of supplying oxygen is expensive, tedious, and requires a lot of expertise and manpower. These problems are overcome by growing micro-algae in the ponds and tanks where sewage treatment is carried out. The algae release the O2 while carrying out the photosynthesis which ensures a continuous supply of oxygen for biodegradation. The algae are also capable of adsorbing certain heavy toxic metals due to the negative charges on the algal cell surface which can take up the positively charged metals. The algal treatment of sewage also supports fish growth as algae are a good source of food for fishes.

H. The environmental impact assessment system requires proponents to foresee possible environmental impacts when a development project is being planned, and to conduct an environmental assessment. However, debate continues on exactly what kinds of environmental protection measures are needed and how they should be integrated into a given project to achieve desirable environmental results. Actions to deal with global warming and to prevent ozone layer depletion are gaining momentum, but currently available technologies may not be enough to meet the required targets. Technological advances are needed in order to make progress in solving these issues, as well as with the problem of dioxins. New developments are also needed in technologies for pollution removal and environmental restoration, in cases where environmental pollution has already been generated or is already accumulating in the environment.

Environmental biotechnology – serving the future

Like white biotechnology, environmental biotechnology, often referred to as “grey biotechnology”, also focuses on sustainability. For instance, environmental biotechnology deals with the treatment of sewage water, the purification of exhaust gas or the decontamination of soils or ground water using specific microorganisms.

The use of organisms for the removal of contamination or pollutants is generally referred to as bioremediation. Originally, bioremediation was mainly used in cleanup operations, including the decomposition of spilt oil or slagheaps containing radioactive waste. In addition, bioremediation is also the method of choice when solvents, plastics or heavy metals and toxic substances like DDT, dioxins or TNT need to be removed.



Bioadsorption processes using newly developed bioadsorbers made from renewable materials are currently being developed. These adsorbers function as ion exchangers and are used in the elimination and disposal of toxic heavy metals. The industrial use of mineral resources leads to the drastic accumulation of these pollutants in the biosphere. The new bioadsorbers are used for the elimination of heavy metals and radionuklids from industrial wastewater, ore mine wastewater, seepage water from dumpsites or wastewater from nuclear power stations.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Environment-friendly COREX®, FINEX® and MIDREX® Ironmaking processes – Essential in today’s changing scenario – A discussion:




Environment-friendly COREX®, FINEX® and MIDREX® Ironmaking processes – Essential in today’s changing scenario – A discussion:

A. Global demand for iron and steel is constantly growing, while at the same time prices for raw materials, energy, and transport continue to increase. At the same time, the requirements of iron making processes are to go compatible with the present ecology and environmental criteria of the region. In this dynamic environment completely new strategies are required for both iron making plant builders and operators. New ironmaking processes have been extensively explored with a view to saving resources and energy, as well as reducing environmental pollution.

Therefore, certain criteria processes should follow, such as:

(a) Full range of cutting-edge solutions in the iron and steelmaking sector,

(b) Increased environmental protection and optimized processes for economical production,

(c) Processes with extended raw material flexibility to encounter increasing raw material availability and cost.

The present scenario of iron and steel sector is very much challenging. Consolidation of the iron and steel branches manifested itself in a significant increase of mergers and takeovers. Nevertheless, the global iron and steel industry continues to expect strong growth. According to the latest analysis, demand for steel will grow by up to 25% by the year 2015, mainly due to rapid economic development in the highly populated Asian countries. In addition to transport and logistics, above all, raw materials and energy are the global driving forces behind the market’s dynamics. Energy costs will also continue to increase.

Growing environmental consciousness also contributes to market dynamics by prompting construction of plants that meet increasingly stringent environmental standards. However, existing plants that produce hot metal must continue to optimize their consumption parameters in the future to achieve increased quality with constant or even lowered operation costs. This is the only way they will be able to strengthen their market performance over the long term. Exact analyses required to keep an overview of this complex market. These include analyses of raw material and energy, feasibility studies and examinations of environmental performance. Today a plant for hot metal and/or DRI production is much more than just a plant. It is part of the entire value added chain in iron and steel production.

B. Today, direct smelting is a much sought-after prize. The traditional blast furnace route for ironmaking is coming under increasing pressure - environmental and economic. Many have tried to develop direct smelting technologies, but the challenge appears to be particularly difficult, certainly more so than one might expect. Out of many processes following three are considered to be most environment-friendly technology for ironmaking: (a) COREX® technology, (b) FINEX® technology, (c) MIDREX® technology.

(a) COREX® technology – It is an industrially and commercially proven direct smelting reduction process that allows for cost-efficient and environmentally compatible production of hot metal directly from iron ore and non-coking coal. This is the only alternative to the conventional blast furnace route consisting of sinter plant, coke oven and blast furnace. It distinguishes itself from the blast furnace route by: (i) Direct use of non-coking coal as reducing agent and energy source and (ii) Iron ore can be directly and feasibly charged to the process in form of lump ore, pellets and sinter.

In this technology, iron ore (lump ore, pellets, sinter or a mixture thereof) are charged into a reduction shaft where they are reduced to direct reduced iron (DRI) by a reduction gas moving in counter flow. Discharge screws convey the DRI from the reduction shaft into the melter gasifier, where final reduction and melting takes place in addition to all other metallurgical reactions. Hot metal and slag tapping are done as in conventional blast furnace practice. Coal is directly charged into the melter gasifier. Coal combustion by oxygen injected into the melter gasifier results in the generation of a highly efficient reduction gas. This gas exits the melter, is cooled and is then blown into the reduction shaft, reducing the iron ores in counter flow to DRI, as described above. The gas leaving the reduction shaft is cooled and cleaned and is suitable for a wide range of applications (e.g., power generation, DRI production or use in reheating furnaces).

Benefits of this process -

(i) Substantially reduced specific investment costs and operation costs compared with conventional blast furnace route,

(ii) Outstanding overall environmental compatibility, as less carbon dioxide is produced;

(iii) Use of COREX export gas for a wide range of applications,

(iv) Use of a wide variety of iron ores and coals,

(v) Elimination of coking plants,

(vi) Hot-metal quality suitable for all steel applications.

COREX process of iron making is in operation at (i) Mittal Steel South Africa, Saldanha Steel Works, South Africa; (ii) Jindal South West Steel, Toranagallu Works, India; (iii) Posco, Pohang Works, Korea; (iv) Baosteel, China (v) Essar steel, India etc.

(b) FINEX® technology – It is an optimized fine-ore reduction process for the direct utilization of the world's vast resources of low-cost iron ore fines for the production of iron. The FINEX® smelting-reduction process based on the direct use of non-coking coal and fine ore is perhaps the most exciting iron making technology on the market today. This is a process with great potential with regard to productivity and the low cost production of hot metal.

In this process fine iron ore is preheated and reduced to fine direct reduced iron (DRI) in a three or four stage fluidized bed reactor system. The upper reactor stage serves primarily as a preheating stage. In the succeeding stages the iron ore is progressively reduced to fine DRI. The fine DRI will be compacted and then charged in the form of hot compacted iron (HCI) into the melter gasifier. The charged HCI is subsequently reduced to metallic iron and melted. The heat needed for the metallurgical reduction work and the melting is supplied by coal gasification with oxygen. The reduction gas, also produced by the coal gasification, is passed through the fluidized bed reactors. The generated FINEX export gas is a highly valuable product and can be further used for DRI/HBI production, electric energy generation or heating purposes.

Benefits of this process -

(i) Favorable economics in comparison to the blast furnace route,

(ii) Environmental benefits due to savings in resources and energy, as well as lower emissions,

(iii) Direct utilization of non-coking coal,

(iv) High valuable export gas for a wide range of applications in metallurgical processes and energy production,

(v) Production of hot metal with similar quality to the blast furnace,

(vi) Reduction of process steps.

FINEX process of iron making is in development / trial-operation stage at Posco, Pohang Works, Korea.

(c) MIDREX® technology – This is a natural gas based shaft furnace process that converts iron oxides in the form of pellets or lump ore into direct reduced iron (DRI).

Benefits of this process -

(i) Fastest start-up, (ii) Simple operation, (iii) Low pressure shaft furnace etc.

MIDREX process of iron making is in operation at Saudi Iron and Steel Company Ltd. (HADEED), Al-Jubail, Saudi Arabia.

C. Discussion: Now the fact is, blast furnace steelmakers, as a group, are only too aware that they are under considerable pressure. Environmental issues with coke ovens and sinter plants continue to plague them, and periodic blast furnace re-lines (in some cases costing a significant proportion of what a new direct smelting plant might cost) continually force re-examination of alternatives. For most, margins are already thin and capital investments needed to address individual environmental issues are not sufficiently attractive. The temptation is to hold off until a decision on the next significant reline falls due, or coke ovens have to be replaced, then assess whether or not a new 'clean' solution, such as direct smelting is more cost-effective.

What benefits would a steelmaker in this situation hope to achieve from direct smelting? In my opinion, the wish-list might be: (i) Ability to use iron ore fines directly, without the need to sinter or pelletise. This will make environmental issues currently associated with sinter plants disappear. (ii) Ability to use coal directly, with no coking or other thermal pre-treatment. Environmental concerns related to coke ovens will vanish as a result. (iii) Ability to use iron ore with higher phosphorus levels, leading to increased iron ore reserves. (iv) Coal consumption rates better than or comparable to those of the blast furnace, leading to similar (or lower) carbon dioxide emissions. (v) Single-train capacities which can sensibly replace a blast furnace, in the range 1.5-4.0 Mt/a. (vi) Ability to recycle iron-bearing wastes.

Therefore, the challenge to the direct smelting technology provider is to tackle most of the above problems faced by steel makers and make the process more compatible with greener environment standards with better economy.